- #Best antivirus for mac os x for mac os x#
- #Best antivirus for mac os x mac os x#
- #Best antivirus for mac os x software#
Sophos required 21.6 seconds and Intego even took 31.7 seconds longer than the reference machine for copying the 26.6 GB of test data.
#Best antivirus for mac os x mac os x#
Only the products from Sophos and Intego put a greater burden on the Mac OS X in this test. The midfield still obtains good results, requiring only 6 to 12 seconds more for the copying procedure than the system without protection. Such a minimal delay would not be noticed in daily use. The times were only 0.1 to 2.6 seconds higher than on the reference PC. In this test category, four products achieve the best results: Symantec, Bitdefender, Intel Security and Webroot. Afterwards, all the protection security solutions were installed individually, and the test was repeated. The reference time for this copying routine was 66.1 seconds. Afterwards, a 26.6 GB set, consisting of various files, such as documents, media files, presentations, and programs were copied back and forth on the computer. For this performance test, a Mac OS X system was run on a reference machine without a protection package. For this reason, the following test category evaluated how heavily a watchdog slows down the system.
#Best antivirus for mac os x software#
The best protection software should always detect everything error-free, and at the same time not put a burden on the system. Most of the other products still have time to increase their performance. The products from Bitdefender, Intel Security and Symantec already exhibited excellent performance for this initial preliminary test. Nonetheless, the testers did gain an initial impression by running the programs through detection, without evaluating them, however. This test category will only be established in subsequent tests.
#Best antivirus for mac os x for mac os x#
The test involving the detection of undesirable, yet not potentially dangerous software ("Potentially unwanted application", or PUA for short) is not yet an integral part of the test procedure for Mac OS X software. The other security solutions passed this test category without a glitch. Only Webroot sounded a warning twice in the test when launching programs, although no danger existed. All the products were able to distinguish error-free between "friend and foe". In this test area, the AV-TEST lab is able to allay any concerns. After all, the user is unsettled for no reason. It is always particularly annoying to users when a file is falsely classified as malware. Only the security package from ClamXav exhibited a total failure here: only 39.6 percent of the malware threats were detected. The other solutions still reached detection rates from 88.7 to 98.7 percent. The packages from Avast and Avira are even available as freeware. Accordingly, 5 out of 10 system watchdogs had a 100 percent malware detection rate in the test: Avast, Avira, Bitdefender, Kaspersky and Symantec. While the first test of OS X security solutions in September 2014 ( "Mac OS X in the Crosshairs – 18 Malware Scanners Put to the Test") revealed that many products had massive problems in detection, the result in this test was significantly better. Afterwards, it was examined how heavily the security solutions slow down the operating system when copying files. At this point, the testers also noted false positive files and applications detected by the solutions. The test configuration was as follows: All the products were required to first identify 160 new malware threats. Four of the products tested are even available as freeware. AV-TEST tested 10 current products from Avast, Avira, Bitdefender, ClamXav, Intego, Kaspersky, Intel Security (formerly McAfee), Symantec, Sophos and Webroot. Anyone who doesn't wish to solely rely on the self-protection of Mac OS X will opt for a sophisticated security solution.
0 kommentar(er)
